The Long-Term Analysis of Hematological Malignancies: Patients with COVID-19 versus without COVID-19

Objective: The study aims to determine the frequency and clinical features of COVID-19 during the long-term follow-up of patients with hematological malignancies.Methods: Patients with hematological malignancies followed in our center were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups with having COVID-19 between April 01, 2020, and July 01, 2021: those who had COVID-19 [COVID (+)] and those who didn't have COVID-19 [COVID (-)].Results: 1258 patients were evaluated. Of these, 288 (22.9%) were found to have had COVID-19. The most common and least common diagnoses in the COVID (+) group were non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (21.7%) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) (6.9%), respectively. The malignancies with the highest and lowest rates of COVID-19 (+) were multiple myeloma (MM) (35.6%) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients (17.8%), respectively. The median age was higher in COVID (+) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients than in COVID (-) patients (73 vs. 66;p= 0.001). All deaths were due to COVID in COVID (+) patients. The mortality rate for all patients was found to be significantly higher in the COVID (+) group than in the COVID (-) group (22.8% vs. 11.9%;p<0.001). Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (39.5%) and acute leukemia (AL) (35.7%) had the highest mortality rates in the COVID (+) group. The mortality rates in COVID (+) CLL (26% vs. 7%), AL (35.7% vs. 17.7%) and MM (28.6% vs. 9.2%) were significantly higher than in the COVID (-) group. There were no deaths due to COVID-19 in CML patients. 79.8% of COVID (+) patients were hospitalized, and the mortality rate in these patients was significantly higher than in outpatients (34.6% vs. 2.8%;p<0.001). The patients with the highest need for mechanic ventilation had MDS (44.8%) and AL (36%).Conclusion: Our study provides important data to the literature comparing the effect of SARS-CoV-2 on all hematological malignancies with malignant patients who do not have COVID-19.

Clinical Features and Treatment Progress of Invasive Mucormycosis in Patients with Hematological Malignancies.

The incidence rate of invasive mucormycosis (IM) in patients with hematological malignancies (HMs) is increasing year by year, ranging from 0.07% to 4.29%, and the mortality rate is mostly higher than 50%. With the ongoing pandemic of COVID-19, COVID-19-associated mucormycosis (CAM) also became a global health threat. Patients with high risk factors such as active HMs, relapsed/refractory leukemia, prolonged neutropenia may still develop breakthrough mucormycosis (BT-MCR) even under the prophylaxis of Mucorales-active antifungals, and such patients often have higher mortality. Rhizopus spp. is the most common genus associated with IM, followed by Mucor spp. and Lichtheimia spp. Pulmonary mucormycosis (PM) is the most common form of IM in patients with HMs, followed by rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis (ROCM) and disseminated mucormycosis. The prognosis of IM patients with neutrophil recovery, localized IM and receiving early combined medical-surgical therapy is usually better. As for management of the disease, risk factors should be eliminated firstly. Liposome amphotericin B (L-AmB) combined with surgery is the initial treatment scheme of IM. Those who are intolerant to L-AmB can choose intravenous formulations or tablets of isavuconazole or posaconazole. Patients who are refractory to monotherapy can turn to combined antifungals therapy.

The Long-Term Analysis of Hematological Malignancies: Patients with COVID-19 versus without COVID-19

Objective: The study aims to determine the frequency and clinical features of COVID-19 during the long-term follow-up of patients with hematological malignancies. Methods: Patients with hematological malignancies followed in our center were evaluated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups with having COVID-19 between April 01, 2020, and July 01, 2021: those who had COVID-19 [COVID (+)] and those who didn't have COVID-19 [COVID (-)]. Results: 1258 patients were evaluated. Of these, 288 (22.9%) were found to have had COVID-19. The most common and least common diagnoses in the COVID (+) group were non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (21.7%) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) (6.9%), respectively. The malignancies with the highest and lowest rates of COVID-19 (+) were multiple myeloma (MM) (35.6%) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients (17.8%), respectively. The median age was higher in COVID (+) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients than in COVID (-) patients (73 vs. 66;p= 0.001). All deaths were due to COVID in COVID (+) patients. The mortality rate for all patients was found to be significantly higher in the COVID (+) group than in the COVID (-) group (22.8% vs. 11.9%;p<0.001). Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (39.5%) and acute leukemia (AL) (35.7%) had the highest mortality rates in the COVID (+) group. The mortality rates in COVID (+) CLL (26% vs. 7%), AL (35.7% vs. 17.7%) and MM (28.6% vs. 9.2%) were significantly higher than in the COVID (-) group. There were no deaths due to COVID-19 in CML patients. 79.8% of COVID (+) patients were hospitalized, and the mortality rate in these patients was significantly higher than in outpatients (34.6% vs. 2.8%;p<0.001). The patients with the highest need for mechanic ventilation had MDS (44.8%) and AL (36%). Conclusion: Our study provides important data to the literature comparing the effect of SARS-CoV-2 on all hematological malignancies with malignant patients who do not have COVID-19.

Comparison of Computed Tomography Scoring Systems in Patients with COVID-19 and Hematological Malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Numerous computed tomography (CT) scales have been proposed to assess lung involvement in COVID-19 pneumonia as well as correlate radiological findings with patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: Comparison of different CT scoring systems in terms of time consumption and diagnostic performance in patients with hematological malignancies and COVID-19 infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis included hematological patients with COVID-19 and CT performed within 10 days of diagnosis of infection. CT scans were analyzed in three different semi-quantitative scoring systems, Chest CT Severity Score (CT-SS), Chest CT Score(CT-S), amd Total Severity Score (TSS), as well as qualitative modified Total Severity Score (m-TSS). Time consumption and diagnostic performance were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty hematological patients were included. Based on the ICC values, excellent inter-observer reliability was found among the three semi-quantitative methods with ICC > 0.9 (p < 0.001). The inter-observer concordance was at the level of perfect agreement (kappa value = 1) for the mTSS method (p < 0.001). The three-receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves revealed excellent and very good diagnostic accuracy for the three quantitative scoring systems. The AUC values were excellent (0.902), very good (0.899), and very good (0.881) in the CT-SS, CT-S and TSS scoring systems, respectively. Sensitivity showed high levels at 72.7%, 75%, and 65.9%, respectively, and specificity was recorded at 98.2%, 100%, 94.6% for the CT-SS, CT-S, and TSS scoring systems, respectively. Time consumption was the same for Chest CT Severity Score and TSS and was longer for Chest CT Score (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Chest CT score and chest CT severity score have very high sensitivity and specificity in terms of diagnostic accuracy. The highest AUC values and the shortest median time of analysis in chest CT severity score indicate this method as preferred for semi-quantitative assessment of chest CT in hematological patients with COVID-19.

Adult Patients with Cancer Have Impaired Humoral Responses to Complete and Booster COVID-19 Vaccination, Especially Those with Hematologic Cancer on Active Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The exclusion of patients with cancer in clinical trials evaluating COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and safety, in combination with the high rate of severe infections, highlights the need for optimizing vaccination strategies. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published available data from prospective and retrospective cohort studies that included patients with either solid or hematological malignancies according to the PRISMA Guidelines. A literature search was performed in the following databases: Medline (Pubmed), Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Google Scholar. Overall, 70 studies were included for the first and second vaccine dose and 60 studies for the third dose. The Effect Size (ES) of the seroconversion rate after the first dose was 0.41 (95%CI: 0.33-0.50) for hematological malignancies and 0.56 (95%CI: 0.47-0.64) for solid tumors. The seroconversion rates after the second dose were 0.62 (95%CI: 0.57-0.67) for hematological malignancies and 0.88 (95%CI: 0.82-0.93) for solid tumors. After the third dose, the ES for seroconversion was estimated at 0.63 (95%CI: 0.54-0.72) for hematological cancer and 0.88 (95%CI: 0.75-0.97) for solid tumors. A subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate potential factors affecting immune response. Production of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was found to be more affected in patients with hematological malignancies, which was attributed to the type of malignancy and treatment with monoclonal antibodies according to the subgroup analyses. Overall, this study highlights that patients with cancer present suboptimal humoral responses after COVID-19 vaccination. Several factors including timing of vaccination in relevance with active therapy, type of therapy, and type of cancer should be considered throughout the immunization process.

COVID-19 in Adult Patients with Hematological Malignancies-Lessons Learned after Three Years of Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic is undoubtedly the most difficult health challenge of the 21st century with more than 600 million laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and over 6.5 million deaths worldwide. The coronavirus pandemic contributed to rapid development of mRNA vaccines, which, along with new antiviral drugs, have been the subject of extensive research for many decades. Nevertheless, elderly, multi-morbid and immunocompromised patients continue to face a more severe clinical course and a higher risk of death from COVID-19, even now that the risk of COVID-19 in the general population is significantly reduced due to the introduction of global vaccination strategies. In this paper, we present the mechanisms of increased susceptibility to infectious complications and the evolution of the clinical course of COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies, taking into account the mutation of the virus and the introduction of vaccines and new antiviral drugs. We also present current recommendations for prophylactic and therapeutic management in patients with hematological malignancies.

Risk factors and outcomes of COVID-19 in adult patients with hematological malignancies: A single-center study showing lower than expected rates of hospitalization and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Studies addressing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with hematological malignancies have reported mortality rates of up to 40%; however, included predominantly hospitalized patients. METHODS: During the first year of the pandemic, we followed adult patients with hematological malignancies treated at a tertiary center in Jerusalem, Israel, who contracted COVID-19, with the aim of studying risk factors for adverse COVID-19-related outcomes. We used remote communication to track patients managed at home-isolation, and patient questioning to assess the source of COVID-19 infection, community versus nosocomial. RESULTS: Our series included 183 patients, median age was 62.5 years, 72% had at least one comorbidity and 39% were receiving active antineoplastic treatment. Hospitalization, critical COVID-19, and mortality rates were 32%, 12.6%, and 9.8%, respectively, remarkably lower than previously reported. Age, multiple comorbidities, and active antineoplastic treatment were significantly associated with hospitalization due to COVID-19. Treatment with monoclonal antibodies was strongly associated with both hospitalization and critical COVID-19. In older (≥60) patients not receiving active antineoplastic treatment, mortality, and severe COVID-19 rates were comparable to those of the general Israeli population. We did not detect patients that contracted COVID-19 within the Hematology Division. CONCLUSION: These findings are relevant for the future management of patients with hematological malignancies in COVID-19-affected regions.

Treatment approaches for managing patients with hematological malignancies in the time of COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is a unique challenge to the care of patients with hematological malignancies. We aim to provide supportive guidance to clinicians making individual patients decisions during the COVID-19 pandemic, in particular during periods that access to healthcare resources may be limited. DISCUSSION: This review also provides recommendations, which are convenient in evaluating indications for therapy, reducing therapy-associated immunosuppression, and reducing healthcare utilization in patients with specific hematological malignancies in the COVID-19 era. Specific decisions regarding treatment of hematological malignancies will need to be individualized, based on disease risk, risk of immunosuppression, rates of community transmission of SARS-CoV-2, and available local healthcare resources.

Outcome of COVID-19 Infection in Cancer Patients in Pune.

Introduction We document our data on the course of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in cancer patients in an attempt to help optimize their management in India and globally. Material and Methods Between February 2020 and January 2021, participating oncologists from Pune (members of the Oncology Group of Pune) documented effect of COVID-19 infection in their cancer patients. Binomial logistic regression analysis as well as correlation analysis was done using Pearson Chi-square test to determine significance of clinical factors. Results A total of 29 oncologists from 20 hospitals contributed their data involving 147 cancer patients who developed COVID-19 infections. COVID-19 infection resulted in higher deaths (likelihood ratio of 4.4) amongst patients with hematological malignancies (12/44 = 27.2%) as compared with those with solid tumors (13/90 = 14.4%, p = 0.030). Patients with uncontrolled or progressive cancer (11/34 = 32.4%) when they got infected with COVID-19 had higher mortality as compared with patients whose cancer was under control (14/113 = 12.4%; p = 0.020). Complication of thromboembolic episodes (seen in eight patients; 5.4% cases) was associated with higher risk (25.6 times) of death (five-eighths; 62.5%) as compared with those who did not develop it (20/139;14.4%; p <0.001). Discussion Patients with cancer should be advised to take strict precautions to reduce the risk of being infected with COVID-19. They should also be given priority for COVID-19 vaccination. If infected with COVID-19, patients with hematological malignancy and uncontrolled cancer are at higher risk of morbidity and mortality. When they are being treated (OPD or inpatient basis), additional precautions are necessary to ensure their exposure to potential COVID-19 virus is minimized. If they get infected with COVID-19, they should be given aggressive treatment to prevent complications, especially thromboembolic episodes. If they develop any thromboembolic complication, their risk of dying are significantly higher, and management should be modified accordingly.

Adverse Hematological Effects of COVID-19 Vaccination and Pathomechanisms of Low Acquired Immunity in Patients with Hematological Malignancies.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus and the COVID-19 pandemic have spread across the world and severely impacted patients living with hematological conditions. Immunocompromised patients experience rapidly progressing symptoms following COVID-19 infection and are at high risk of death. In efforts to protect the vulnerable population, vaccination efforts have increased exponentially in the past 2 years. Although COVID-19 vaccination is safe and effective, mild to moderate side effects such as headache, fatigue, and soreness at the injection site have been reported. In addition, there are reports of rare side effects, including anaphylaxis, thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, myocarditis, and pericarditis after vaccination. Further, hematological abnormalities and a very low and transient response in patients with hematological conditions after vaccination raise concerns. The objective of this review is to first briefly discuss the hematological adverse effects associated with COVID-19 infection in general populations followed by critically analyzing the side effects and pathomechanisms of COVID-19 vaccination in immunocompromised patients with hematological and solid malignancies. We reviewed the published literature, with a focus on hematological abnormalities associated with COVID-19 infection followed by the hematological side effects of COVID-19 vaccination, and the mechanisms by which complications can occur. We extend this discussion to include the viability of vaccination efforts within immune-compromised patients. The primary aim is to provide clinicians with critical hematologic information on COVID-19 vaccination so that they can make informed decisions on how to protect their at-risk patients. The secondary goal is to clarify the adverse hematological effects associated with infection and vaccination within the general population to support continued vaccination within this group. There is a clear need to protect patients with hematological conditions from infection and modulate vaccine programs and procedures for these patients.

Hematological Questions in Personalized Management of COVID-19 Vaccination.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has been causing a worldwide pandemic since 2019. Many vaccines have been manufactured and have shown promising results in reducing disease morbidity and mortality. However, a variety of vaccine-related adverse effects, including hematological events, have been reported, such as thromboembolic events, thrombocytopenia, and bleeding. Moreover, a new syndrome, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, following vaccination against COVID-19 has been recognized. These hematologic side effects have also raised concerns about SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with preexisting hematologic conditions. Patients with hematological tumors are at a higher risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the efficacy and safety of vaccination in this group remain uncertain and have raised attention. In this review, we discuss the hematological events following COVID-19 vaccination and vaccination in patients with hematological disorders.

Impaired adaptive immune response in COVID-19 convalescent patients with hematological malignancies.

OBJECTIVES: The immune dysregulation during SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to worsen immune homeostasis after recovery. Patients with hematological malignancies with COVID-19 have changes both in the innate and adaptive immune responses. Little is known about the severity of immune dysfunction following recovery from COVID-19 in hematological patients. METHODS: Here, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by FACS Canto II in 55 patients, including 42 with hematological malignancies 4-6 weeks after COVID-19. RESULTS: Hematological COVID-19 convalescents had deep reduction in CD3+ T cells, including helper T cells (CD3 + CD4+), naïve helper T cells (CD3 + CD4 + CD45RA+), and memory CD4+ T cells among with extremely low levels of Treg cells and decreased expression of both TCRα/ß and TCRγ/δ. Severe immune dysregulation in hematological convalescents was expressed by increased activation of T lymphocytes, both as elevated levels of activated T cells (CD3 + HLA-DR+) and activated cytotoxic T cells (CD3 + CD8 + HLA-DR+). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings showed a profound impairment of the adaptive immune response in hematological convalescents which might be a result of persistent activation of T cells. Convalescents with lymphoid malignancies showed more pronounced depletion of key T lymphocytes subpopulations in creating an effective adaptive response and immune memory.

Clinical and Serological Follow-Up of 216 Patients with Hematological Malignancies after Vaccination with Pfizer-BioNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 in a Real-World Study.

Hematological malignancies (HMs) have heterogeneous serological responses after vaccination due to disease or treatment. The aim of this real-world study was to analyze it after Pfizer-BioNT162b2 mRNA vaccination in 216 patients followed up for 1 year. The first 43 patients had an initial follow-up by a telemedicine (TM) system with no major events reported. The anti-spike IgG antibodies were checked 3-4 weeks post-first vaccination and every 3-4 months, by two standard bioassays and a rapid serological test (RST). Vaccine boosts were given when the level was <7 BAU/mL. Patients who did not seroconvert after 3-4 doses received tixagevimab/cilgavimab (TC). Fifteen results were discordant between two standard bioassays. Good agreement was observed between the standard and RST in 97 samples. After two doses, 68% were seroconverted (median = 59 BAU/mL) with a median of 162 BAU/mL and 9 BAU/mL, respectively, in untreated and treated patients (p < 0.001), particularly for patients receiving rituximab. Patients with gammaglobulin levels < 5 g/L had reduced seroconversion compared to higher levels (p = 0.019). The median levels were 228 BAU/mL post-second dose if seroconverted post-first and second, or if seroconverted only post-second dose. A total of 68% of post-second dose negative patients were post-third dose positive. A total of 16% received TC, six with non-severe symptomatic COVID-19 within 15-40 days. Personalized serological follow-up should apply particularly to patients with HMs.

Serological and cellular response to mRNA-SARS-CoV2 vaccine in patients with hematological lymphoid malignancies: Results of the study "Cervax".

messenger RNA (mRNA)-Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) vaccines such as BNT162b2 became available in late 2020, but hematological malignancy patients (HM pts) were not evaluated in initial registration trials. We hereby report the results of a prospective, unicentric, observational study Response to COVID-19 Vaccination in hEmatological malignancies (CERVAX) developed to assess the postvaccine serological and T-cell-mediated response in a cohort of SARS-CoV2-negative HM pts vaccinated with BNT162b2. Patients with lymphomas [non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL)], chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and multiple myeloma (MM); off-therapy for at least 3 months; in a watch-and-wait program; or in treatment with ibrutinib, venetoclax, and lenalidomide were included. Different time points were considered to assess the serological response to the vaccine: before the second dose (T1), at 3-6-12 months after the first dose (T2-3-4, respectively). Since March 2021, 39 pts have been enrolled: 15 (38%) NHL, 12 (31%) CLL, and 12 (31%) MM. There were 13 of the 39 pts (33%) seroconverted at T1; an increase of the serological response was registered after the second dose (T2) (22/39 pts, 56%) and maintained after 6 months (22/39 pts, 56%) and 12 months (24/39 pts, 61%) from the first dose (T3-T4, respectively). Non-serological responders at T4 were 7/39 (18%): 0/15 NHL, 1/12 MM (8%), and 6/12 CLL (50%). All of them were on therapy (one lenalidomide, three ibrutinib, and three venetoclax). SARS-CoV2-reactive T-cell analysis (interferon gamma release assays) was available since June 2022 and was evaluated at 12 months (T4) from the first dose of vaccine in 31/39 pts (79%). T-cell-mediated-responders were 17/31 (55%): most of them were NHL and MM (47%, 41% and 12% for NHL, MM, and CLL, respectively). Both serological and T-cell non-responders were represented by pts on active therapy (venetoclax/ibrutinib). During the period of observation, eight (20.5%) pts developed mild SARS-CoV2 infection; no coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19)-related deaths or hospitalizations were registered. In conclusion, in our cohort of lymphoproliferative pts receiving BNT162b2, CLL diagnosis and venetoclax/ibrutinib seem to be related with a lower humoral or T-mediated response. Nevertheless, the efficacy of mRNA vaccine in HM pts and the importance to continue the vaccine program even in non-responders after the first dose are supported in our study by demonstrating that a humoral and T-cell-mediated seroconversion should be observed even in the subsets of heavily immunocompromised pts.

COVID-19 Severity and Survival over Time in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies: A Population-Based Registry Study.

Mortality rates for COVID-19 have declined over time in the general population, but data in patients with hematologic malignancies are contradictory. We identified independent prognostic factors for COVID-19 severity and survival in unvaccinated patients with hematologic malignancies, compared mortality rates over time and versus non-cancer inpatients, and investigated post COVID-19 condition. Data were analyzed from 1166 consecutive, eligible patients with hematologic malignancies from the population-based HEMATO-MADRID registry, Spain, with COVID-19 prior to vaccination roll-out, stratified into early (February-June 2020; n = 769 (66%)) and later (July 2020-February 2021; n = 397 (34%)) cohorts. Propensity-score matched non-cancer patients were identified from the SEMI-COVID registry. A lower proportion of patients were hospitalized in the later waves (54.2%) compared to the earlier (88.6%), OR 0.15, 95%CI 0.11-0.20. The proportion of hospitalized patients admitted to the ICU was higher in the later cohort (103/215, 47.9%) compared with the early cohort (170/681, 25.0%, 2.77; 2.01-3.82). The reduced 30-day mortality between early and later cohorts of non-cancer inpatients (29.6% vs. 12.6%, OR 0.34; 0.22-0.53) was not paralleled in inpatients with hematologic malignancies (32.3% vs. 34.8%, OR 1.12; 0.81-1.5). Among evaluable patients, 27.3% had post COVID-19 condition. These findings will help inform evidence-based preventive and therapeutic strategies for patients with hematologic malignancies and COVID-19 diagnosis.

COVID-19 Cluster in the Hematology/Respirology Ward of a University Hospital during the Seventh Wave of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic in Japan: A Descriptive Study.

Objective Patients with hematological malignancies and solid organ tumors reportedly tend to have a more severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) trajectory than do those with other diseases. We studied the clinical features and outcomes of nosocomial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during the seventh wave of the pandemic. Methods This study retrospectively described the characteristics of COVID-19 clusters involving patients in the hematology/respirology ward of Kochi Medical School Hospital during the seventh wave of the pandemic of SARS-CoV-2. Patients A total of 40 individuals, including 25 patients and 15 healthcare workers, were studied. The diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection was based on reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction performed on nasopharyngeal samples. Results Eleven patients had hematological diseases, and 14 had respiratory diseases. Most patients presented with a fever (n=19) and/or sore throat (n=10). Lower respiratory tract symptoms and pneumonia were rather infrequent, occurring in two patients. All patients received antivirals. The maximal severities were mild in 21 patients and moderate in 2. Two asymptomatic patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection did not develop symptoms of COVID-19. Cycle threshold values in nasopharyngeal samples were significantly lower in patients with COVID-19 than in those who were asymptomatic at the time of the diagnosis with SARS-CoV-2 infection. All SARS-CoV-2-infected inpatients recovered or did not develop symptoms of COVID-19. Conclusion COVID-19 vaccination, early or preemptive treatment with antivirals, and intrinsic changes in SARS-CoV-2 may have contributed to the more favorable outcomes in our series than in previously reported nosocomial clusters.

Early administration of remdesivir plus convalescent plasma therapy is effective to treat COVID-19 pneumonia in B-cell depleted patients with hematological malignancies.

Patients with hematological malignancies (HMs) are at a higher risk of developing severe form and protracted course of COVID-19 disease. We investigated whether the combination of viral replication inhibition with remdesivir and administration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins with convalescent plasma (CP) therapy might be sufficient to treat B-cell-depleted patients with COVID-19. We enrolled 20 consecutive patients with various HMs with profound B-cell lymphopenia and COVID-19 pneumonia between December 2020 and May 2021. All patients demonstrated undetectable baseline anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin levels before CP. Each patient received at least a complete course of remdesivir and at least one unit of CP. Previous anti-CD20 therapy resulted in a more prolonged SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity compared to other causes of B-cell lymphopenia (p = 0.004). Timing of CP therapy showed a significant impact on the clinical outcome. Simultaneous use of remdesivir and CP reduced time period for oxygen weaning after diagnosis (p = 0.017), length of hospital stay (p = 0.007), and PCR positivity (p = 0.012) compared to patients who received remdesivir and CP consecutively. In addition, time from the diagnosis to CP therapy affected the length of oxygen dependency (p < 0.001) and hospital stay (p < 0.0001). In those cases where there were at least 10 days from the diagnosis to plasma administration, oxygen dependency was prolonged vs. patients with shorter interval (p = 0.006). In conclusion, the combination of inhibition of viral replication with passive immunization was proved to be efficient and safe. Our results suggest the clear benefit of early, combined administration of remdesivir and CP to avoid protracted COVID-19 disease among patients with HMs and B-cell lymphopenia.

BTK inhibitors in the treatment of hematological malignancies and inflammatory diseases: mechanisms and clinical studies.

Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is an essential component of multiple signaling pathways that regulate B cell and myeloid cell proliferation, survival, and functions, making it a promising therapeutic target for various B cell malignancies and inflammatory diseases. Five small molecule inhibitors have shown remarkable efficacy and have been approved to treat different types of hematological cancers, including ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib, tirabrutinib, and orelabrutinib. The first-in-class agent, ibrutinib, has created a new era of chemotherapy-free treatment of B cell malignancies. Ibrutinib is so popular and became the fourth top-selling cancer drug worldwide in 2021. To reduce the off-target effects and overcome the acquired resistance of ibrutinib, significant efforts have been made in developing highly selective second- and third-generation BTK inhibitors and various combination approaches. Over the past few years, BTK inhibitors have also been repurposed for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Promising data have been obtained from preclinical and early-phase clinical studies. In this review, we summarized current progress in applying BTK inhibitors in the treatment of hematological malignancies and inflammatory disorders, highlighting available results from clinical studies.